
Also known as | Ramage’s row house |
---|---|
Previous Address | |
Constructed | (1st) 5/7/1864 (2nd) 2012 |
Style | |
Architect | |
Builder | (1st) William Ramage, Melbourne (2nd) unknown |
Timelapse Building Images

Four level block consisting of 3 flats and 3 offices replaced the single story factory in 2012.
This site is a classic example of what all too frequently happens under the Planning Scheme of the Melbourne City Council. Small single fronted and even double fronted blocks that were intended for the provision of mixed working class and middle class housing in the mid to late Victorian period have been randomly consolidated into larger parcels onto which this form of over-development has occurred.
The overdevelopment of this site imposes a scale of development which is completely out of character with the existing surrounding period architectural style of Victorian single and double storey homes.
The Planning Scheme encourages Mixed Use developments. This in itself is not inconsistent with the Victorian settlement patterns but in its modern interpretation does encourage out of scale densities. However, this may apply as much to residential-only developments. The resulting building form lacks a positive balance and harmony with its surrounding neighbours.
Many potential residents who aspire to live in inner Melbourne would prefer to live in a discrete residential home with its own open space; an opportunity provided by sites such as the original 56 to 62 Abbotsford Street, especially with an imaginative and clever renovation/extension.
The major determinant of this intensification policy is the increase in land values. The developers need greater density to justify their profits. This direction is reinforced by decisions of the undemocratically elected City of Melbourne where residential votes are completely outweighed by the votes of companies and non-residential property owners. This gerrymander is supported by the State Government which is responsible for setting up the Council and the State also endorses greater densification.
It is clear that the current rules encourage greater density. Multi-story developments are facilitated. They are constructed boundary to boundary and provide minimal open space, apart from limited balconies. The tragedy of the situation is that the Melbourne Planning Scheme encourages further height increases when future developments are proposed to raise even further the residential density of the local area, using the height of these rogue buildings as a precedent for higher development.
If you are a concerned resident, get more involved and raise your voice in support when ever possible, help to strengthen local historical heritage laws, otherwise single and double storey cottages maybe doomed in the longer term, despite whatever protection may be given by the existing less than robust Heritage controls.

Single story factory replaced 4 single story Victorian terrace homes in 1961.
Building Details
A four level block consisting of 3 flats and 3 offices replaced the single story factory in 2012.
City of Melbourne
Three room house and additions. (with rear open garden space)
Notice of Intent to Build.
5th July 1864, Registration number 331.
Fee paid: £2.0.0
Builder: Mr. W Ramage, Melbourne.
Owner: Mr David Lander.
Burchett Index
Subsequent Building Alterations
William Ramage’s historic 1864 house was sadly demolished around 1957 and has since been replaced with flats that has no front or back garden space.

This is the 1895 MMBW map. The valued front and back yard open garden space marked green at 56 to 62 Abbotsford street which these 4 Victorian era terrace homes once had has all since been lost and are now totally built over by the redevelopment.
http://maps.melbourne.vic.gov.au
Architectural Features
Heritage Significance and Listings
Heritage Listings and Explanatory Notes |
---|
The group of modern flats recently erected on 56-58 Abbotsford street site which replaced the previous 4 homes that had unique social and historical value and constructed here in the Victorian period, the new build has zero historical or social heritage significance nor does it have any front or back open garden space unlike other existing Victorian terraces that the surrounding area have. |
Owners
From | To | Owner | More Info | Data Source |
---|---|---|---|---|
1975 | to date | Private | Hatcher Index | |
1974 | 1974 | Hemax Nominees P/L | Hatcher Index | |
1968 | 1973 | Mario & Helena Schwartz | Hatcher Index | |
1962 | 1967 | Alfred Salamon & Mano Schwartz | Hatcher Index | |
1944 | 1961 | Iris Barker Stafford | Hatcher Index | |
1943 | 1943 | Amy Joan Dooley | Hatcher Index | |
1934 | 1942 | William Henry Dooley | Hatcher Index | |
1925 | 1933 | Amy Edith Dooley | Hatcher Index | |
1924 | 1924 | Jasmes & Mary McKendrick | Hatcher Index | |
1908 | 1923 | Mrs Hannah Hughes | Hatcher Index | |
1901 | 1907 | Jane Lauder or Lander | Hatcher Index | |
1864 | 1900 | David & Jane Lauder or Lander | Hatcher Index | |
1863 | J Downie (crown land purchaser) | Hatcher Index | ||
abt 40 thousand years earlier | 1835 | Boon Wurrung and Woiwurrung (Wurundjeri) peoples of the Kulin Nation | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Victoria | Hatcher Index |
Residents
From | To | Resident | More Info | Data Source |
---|---|---|---|---|
1975 | to date | Private | Hatcher Index | |
1974 | 1974 | Hemax Nominees P/L | Hatcher Index | |
1963 | 1973 | Butternick/Vogue P/L | Hatcher Index | |
1962 | 1962 | vacant land | Hatcher Index | |
1959 | 1961 | Albert Edward Stearne | Hatcher Index | |
1950 | 1958 | Betty Stearne | Hatcher Index | |
1943 | 1949 | Mrs Doreen Pearl Long | Hatcher Index | |
1933 | 1942 | Andrew & Mary Wilson | Hatcher Index | |
1931 | 1932 | Samuel Burnside | Hatcher Index | |
1929 | 1930 | Mrs Emily Frances Williams | Hatcher Index | |
1927 | 1928 | George Neil | Hatcher Index | |
1919 | 1925 | Walter T Fielder | Hatcher Index | |
1917 | 1917 | George H Powell | Hatcher Index | |
1916 | 1916 | Sydney Wilson | Hatcher Index | |
1915 | 1915 | Michael Donohue | Hatcher Index | |
1910 | 1914 | Patrick Green | Hatcher Index | |
1906 | 1909 | Patrick & Ellen Anne Green | Hatcher Index | |
1902 | 1905 | George West | Hatcher Index | |
1899 | 1901 | William Muir | Hatcher Index | |
1898 | 1898 | James Lindsay | Hatcher Index | |
1893 | 1897 | James & Frances O’Brien | https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/8716611?searchTerm=%2256%20Abbotsford%20street%22&searchLimits=dateFrom=1850-01-01|||dateTo=1960-12-31|||l-advstate=Victoria | Hatcher Index |
1886 | 1892 | Henry W Esby or Easby | Hatcher Index | |
1885 | 1885 | Henry Rainer | Hatcher Index | |
1884 | 1884 | James Chambers | Hatcher Index | |
1883 | 1883 | Henry Thompson | Hatcher Index | |
1880 | 1882 | John Ingram | Hatcher Index | |
1879 | 1879 | James Waters | Hatcher Index | |
1873 | 1878 | John Milne | Hatcher Index | |
1871 | 1872 | Jonathan Cox | Hatcher Index | |
1868 | 1870 | James Cunningham | Hatcher Index | |
1867 | 1867 | Lauder | Hatcher Index | |
1866 | 1866 | Henry Hart | Hatcher Index |
Social History
Mary & Andrew Wilson lived at 56 Abbotsford street from 1933 to 1942.
The Age

Anne & Patrick Green lived at 56 Abbotsford street from 1906 to 1914
The Herald

James & Frances O’Brien lived at 56 Abbotsford street from 1893 to 1897
The Argus

James Cunningham lived at 56 Abbotsford street West Melbourne in 1868.
Sands & McDougall directory

Context and Streetscape
Precinct |
---|
The current property resides within the municipality of the City of Melbourne. We respectfully acknowledge it is on the traditional land of the Kulin Nation.
source: https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/history-city-of-melbourne.pdf
historical map source: https://www.slv.vic.gov.au/search-discover/explore-collections-format/maps/maps-melbourne-city-suburbs
|
Zoning |
---|
The controls listed below affect this property: This information must be verified with the relevant planning or heritage authority.
|
Streetscape |
---|
This streetscape contains a collection of historic Victorian buildings and later buildings. The Victorian homes are socially and historically significant buildings for the early development of North & West Melbourne in their own right. |